This is the mail archive of the docbook@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list for the DocBook project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
My authoring group is working on making the transition to DocBook. We've been discussing the versioning of documents recently. Until now, I had required that when making changes to a document, everyone should add a revision element with an incremented revnumber child (as well as the other revision content). However, my group is uncomfortable with the use of an internal revnumber, as it does not correspond with the external numbers applied to files under version control or product releases. What I thought I would do, then, was to make the revnumber optional; we could still refer to revisions by date and the revnumber wouldn't conflict with other numerical identifiers that we have floating around. Then I noticed that DocBook requires revnumber. I was wondering if someone on the list could provide more insight into this decision, both so that I can understand the content model better and so that I can explain it to my group and work around it. Thanks, John L. Clark
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |