This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
shading cells [was: DocBook Technical Committee MeetingMinutes: 18 Feb 2003]
- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso at arbortext dot com>
- To: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 21:41:49 -0600
- Subject: DOCBOOK: shading cells [was: DocBook Technical Committee MeetingMinutes: 18 Feb 2003]
- References: <87of59bpgn.fsf@nwalsh.com> <87of59bpgn.fsf@nwalsh.com>
At 14:35 2003 02 18 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----
>
>| 685511 shading/color support for tables
>
>For Scott's purposes, the PIs are probably a workable solution.
>
>BS: People could use roles for this and then customize the stylesheets.
>
>SC: We use processing instructions as well.
>
>BS: It's not really part of the semantic model of the element. There's
>no indication in the actual element that there's a semantic reason for
>it to be shaded. I can easily see role used as an alternative for
>this.
>
>NW: For the DocBook stylesheets, you'd have to use two PIs so it might
>make sense to have a common PI for both HTML and FO.
>
>SC: Maybe it makes sense to define some common processing
>instructions.
>
>NW: Maybe this would be a chance for us to say, "here use this one".
>
>ACTION: Norm to put releasein 4.3 or 5.0 or whatever's next on the agenda.
I'm not sure I follow what the discussion concluded, and I'm unclear on
what the action item is. Could someone clarify?
paul