This is the mail archive of the docbook@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list for the DocBook project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

shading cells [was: DocBook Technical Committee MeetingMinutes: 18 Feb 2003]


At 14:35 2003 02 18 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----
>
>|      685511 shading/color support for tables
>
>For Scott's purposes, the PIs are probably a workable solution.
>
>BS: People could use roles for this and then customize the stylesheets.
>
>SC: We use processing instructions as well.
>
>BS: It's not really part of the semantic model of the element. There's
>no indication in the actual element that there's a semantic reason for
>it to be shaded. I can easily see role used as an alternative for
>this.
>
>NW: For the DocBook stylesheets, you'd have to use two PIs so it might
>make sense to have a common PI for both HTML and FO.
>
>SC: Maybe it makes sense to define some common processing
>instructions.
>
>NW: Maybe this would be a chance for us to say, "here use this one".
>
>ACTION: Norm to put releasein 4.3 or 5.0 or whatever's next on the agenda.


I'm not sure I follow what the discussion concluded, and I'm unclear on 
what the action item is.  Could someone clarify?

paul



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]