DOCBOOK: Re: Issues with processing expectations of the proposedannotation element

[Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>]

/ Yann Dirson <ydirson@fr.alcove.com> was heard to say:
| How do people feel <annotation> would relate to <footnote> and <remark> ?

You might sell me on deprecating remark in favor of a class of
annotation, but I think footnote should stay. It already exists, it
has well understood semantics, and it has a related footnoteref
element.

Remark, on the other hand, is really a sort of kind of annotation and
someone recently asked why it can't contain paras and such.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>      | Necessity may be the mother of
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | invention, but Yankees invent
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | because it's cold outside and
                                   | we're cheap.