This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
RE: Re: packagename proposal/RFE
- From: David Cramer <dcramer at broadjump dot com>
- To: Bob Stayton <bobs at caldera dot com>, "Matt G." <matt_g_ at hotmail dot com>,jirka at kosek dot cz
- Cc: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 11:05:55 -0500
- Subject: RE: DOCBOOK: Re: packagename proposal/RFE
I'd like to second that point. Compare <oointerface> v. <interface>.
Consistency seems to require <oopackage>.
David
> To add another dimension to the discussion, the word
> "package" in the field of software can also mean
> a package of software for distribution, such as an
> RPM package. Authors who deal with packaging software
> but not APIs will perhaps misuse a <package> element.
> The advantage of the oo* names is that they are
> specific to their subfield.