This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: objection to docbook.dcl
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka at kosek dot cz>
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: objection to docbook.dcl
- From: Adam Di Carlo <adam at onshore dot com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 16:59:04 -0400
- Cc: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- References: <oawv9jbmm4.fsf@arroz.fake><15034.15818.645510.44622@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <oa1yrk2yio.fsf@arroz.fake><3ABF9A08.8D14FBE6@kosek.cz>
Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> writes:
> Would not be better to package XML version of DocBook to Linux
> distributions as there are many new tools which are not able to process
> SGML?
We try to package it all and let the user decide. Who am I to say,
"don't use SGML" ?
Anyhow, you're point has nothing to do with my question, which is,
"What exactly is the normative status of docbook.dcl for SGML
documents". Norm told me it's not normative, that's good enough for
me.
> I have one question to you, as you are preparing packages for Debian
> system. Are there any common directory where are XSL DocBook stylesheets
> usually placed? I would like to autodetect these for PHPDOC, but AFAIK
> there exist packages only for DSSSL with some common locations. Thanks.
Um, right now it's
/usr/lib/sgml/stylesheet/xsl/docbook/nwalsh/
That should be moving to our "take" on the LSB standard SGML
locations, see
http://dulug.duke.edu/~mark/debian/sgml/lsb-on-debian.html/ .
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onshore.com.....<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: docbook-request@lists.oasis-open.org