This is the mail archive of the
docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the docbook-tools project.
Re: was something else - now SGML and XML
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- Subject: Re: was something else - now SGML and XML
- From: David Mason <dcm at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:43:04 -0500
- Cc: docbook-tools-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <951281049.19725.ezmlm@sourceware.cygnus.com>
<200002231540.KAA08528@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
<7453-Wed23Feb2000110215-0500-ndw@nwalsh.com>
X-URL: <http://www.redhat.com>
From: "David C. Mason" <dcm@redhat.com>
Date: 23 Feb 2000 11:43:04 -0500
Message-ID: <y9xk8jv3m5j.fsf@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes:
> If you're referring to IE5 support for XSL, it's so badly broken
> that it's just about useless. (Worse than useless, in fact.)
Is that true - I, obviously, don't use IE but I see a lot of traffic on
the DocBook lists from people who do and despite the fact that they
are usually trying to work around some problem - there sure seems to
be a lot of people using it. Is that true or am I trapped in a good
marketing scheme?
Dave