This is the mail archive of the
docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the docbook-tools project.
RE: first page in chapter..... (now possibly jade/jadetex bug?)
- To: "'Hugo dot van dot der dot Kooij at caiw dot nl'" <Hugo dot van dot der dot Kooij at caiw dot nl>
- Subject: RE: first page in chapter..... (now possibly jade/jadetex bug?)
- From: Gary Stainburn <gary dot stainburn at ringways dot co dot uk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:06:51 -0000
- Cc: "'DocBook Discussion List'" <docbook-tools-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl [SMTP:Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 1999 10:54 PM
To: Gary Stainburn
Cc: 'DocBook Discussion List'
Subject: Re: first page in chapter, preface and appendix.
#On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, Gary Stainburn wrote:
#
#> I posted this problem about a week ago, along with some other problem.
#>
#> This one is still outstanding and I'm out of my depth (at the mo).
#>
#> The first page of preface, chapters, and appendices always put the page number
#> on the right hand side of the page, regardless of whether it's an odd or an even
#> page.
#>
#> I'm using the Redhat 5.2 RPMS and have (as far as I know) not changed anything
#> except increasing some values in texmf.cnf.
#
#As far as I know this is aknown but unsolved bug. (As I recall from my
#feeble memory.) More details could be found on the sgml-tools mailinglist
#archive. (http://www.via.ecp.fr/ml/sgml-tools/)
#
#Hugo.
[snip]
Hi, me again.
I've found this in the archive:
[snip]
In my experience the Tex back end always gets the page numbers
wrong, just as you report. i.e. The title page is "1", and
the rest are numbered "2", "3" and so on. Also the first
page of each chapter formatted to appear on
the right hand side, but gets printed as the next page rather than
the next odd page.
[snip]
If I understand things right, Jade generates Tex which pdfjadetex or
jadetex converts to PDF or dvi relatively.
This would then mean that the problem is in jade or *jadetex.
Does anyone know how this can be fixed, or have a workaround?
cheers,
-----------------------------------------
Gary Stainburn.
Work: http://www.ringways.co.uk gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk
REVCOM: http://www.revcom.dhs.org http://www.revcom.org.uk gary.stainburn@revcom.org.uk
-----------------------------------------
The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from. -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum
-----------------------------------------