This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: [docbook-apps] Extension functions and XSLT 2.0
- From: "Bob Stayton" <bobs at sagehill dot net>
- To: <docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org>, "Colin Paul Adams" <colin at colina dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:49:12 -0700
- Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Extension functions and XSLT 2.0
- References: <m3656av48p.fsf@colina.demon.co.uk> <m31xgyuzvj.fsf@colina.demon.co.uk>
Hi Colin,
The source code for the Java extensions ships with the DocBook XSL
distribution. See the extensions/saxon643/com/nwalsh/saxon directory, for
example.
Just a word of warning: the stylesheets have not been updated for XSLT 2.0.
I can't say when that will happen since it isn't a full W3C Recommendation
yet. Maybe Norm is working on it.
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
DocBook Consulting
bobs@sagehill.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin Paul Adams" <colin@colina.demon.co.uk>
To: <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 6:55 AM
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Extension functions and XSLT 2.0
> >>>>> "Colin" == Colin Paul Adams <colin@colina.demon.co.uk> writes:
>
> Colin> Now since XSLT has no need for a node-set extension
> Colin> function, I do not propose to write one. Can the code be
> Colin> updated to accomodate this possiblity?
>
> Never mind. I realise I can implement it as a no-op, which will be
> more compatible generally.
>
> But what about the extensions in table.xsl. Are these documented
> anywhere (or better, is source code available for existing
implementations)?
> --
> Colin Paul Adams
> Preston Lancashire
>
>