This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
RE: Re: Chunked HTML file names too long for ISO966 0
- From: Jeff Beal <jeff dot beal at ansys dot com>
- To: 'Steinar Bang' <sb at dod dot no>, docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 08:53:50 -0500
- Subject: RE: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Chunked HTML file names too long for ISO966 0
No, they aren't persistent. The names are generated based on their position
within the current document. Have you considered using the <?dbhtml
filename="xxxx.html"?> processing instruction? If you place this as a child
of the element you are chunking, the stylesheets will use that over the ID.
So, you could have something like:
<chapter id="reallylongdescriptiveid">
<?dbhtml filename="chap1.html"?>
...
</chapter>
<chapter id="shorter">
...
</chapter>
Your first chapter would be written to file "chap1.html", and the second
would be written to "shorter.html".
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Steinar Bang [mailto:sb at dod dot no]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 2:12 AM
To: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Chunked HTML file names too long for ISO9660
>>>>> Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>:
> Do you need the ID-based filenames?
Need, no. Prefer, yes.
> Would the automatically generated names not be ok?
Are these names persistent, if sections change order in the XML
source?