This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: questions about validity of certain blocks
- From: Bob Stayton <bobs at sco dot com>
- To: Carlos Araya <carlos at cvc dot edu>
- Cc: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:02:28 -0800
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: questions about validity of certain blocks
- References: <00e801c2dd13$1cf91c00$12ea1299@rivendell>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 01:16:07PM -0800, Carlos Araya wrote:
> Good afternoon:
>
> I've been using Docbook for a while and now have the following questions:
>
> 1. What can I use to replace the combinations below? EpcEdit (the free
> version) is complaining about them and I don't see anything wrong with them,
> they convert to HTML without a problem...
>
> A.
> <blockquote><para>A long December and there's reason to belive<sbr/>
> maybe this year will be better than the last<sbr/>
> <attribution><citetitle>A long December</citetitle> -- Counting
> Crows</attribution></para></blockquote>
<sbr/> is only permitted in arg, cmdsynopsis, and group.
> B.
> <literallayout><emphasis role="bold">Memorial Wall</emphasis>
> <emphasis role="bold">The Mall</emphasis>
> <emphasis role="bold">New Washington DC</emphasis>
> <emphasis role="bold">Christmas, 2090</emphasis></literallayout>
This looks ok to me.
> 2. Can <sbr/> be used to generate HTML <br> Tags?
Only in synposes.
> 3. Can I use <footnote> inside a <para>? Again EpcEdit complains that it's
> not valid
Yes, footnote is valid inside a para.
Bob Stayton 400 Encinal Street
Publications Architect Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Technical Publications voice: (831) 427-7796
The SCO Group fax: (831) 429-1887
email: bobs at sco dot com