This is the mail archive of the docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: avoiding TT


Carlos Araya wrote:


To answer Adam's question... attributes such as kbd

kbd is not an attribute.

and all other physical
markup such as bold, italics, underline and strikethrough are being phased
out in favor of using CSS or the logical markup tags such as emphasis,
strong and related.

kbd is neither presentational nor deprecated, AFAICS.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/text.html#edef-KBD
"Indicates text to be entered by the user."

Presentational markup is being phased out, and structural/semantic markup remains (ideally).

Some deprecated presentational elements:
center, font, strike / s, u.

Unfortunately, XHTML doesn't really evolve in a direction where it would not be concerned be with display at all, and where it would offer rich semantics.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/lists.html#edef-DIR
shows that they unfortunately don't see much value in semantic differences, "if the rendering is the same"(!).
:( ...

Anyway, his point was to move from presentational tt to semantic kbd.

Tobi

--
http://www.pinkjuice.com/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]