This is the mail archive of the docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list .

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: <nextCatalog> for both 4.1.2 and 4.2?

From: Steinar Bang <sb at dod dot no>
To: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 22:08:58 +0100
Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: <nextCatalog> for both 4.1.2 and 4.2?
References: <20021111014416.A17545@caldera.com><874r7m9xln.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no> <20030202170958.B21457@sco.com>

>>>>> Bob Stayton <bobs@caldera.com>:

> Yes, you can have a <nextCatalog> that points to an XML catalog for
> 4.1.2 and another <nextCatalog> that points to 4.2.  If it is
> resolving the PUBLIC identifier in the document, then there is no
> ambiguity.

I was pondering why why not have an XML catalog file containing only
<nextCatalog> entries, pointing to the catalog files bundled with the
DocBook XML tarballs?

But of course these catalogs don't contain mappings for system
identifiers.

References:
- <nextCatalog> for both 4.1.2 and 4.2? (Was: XML catalogdocumentation)
  - From: Steinar Bang
- Re: <nextCatalog> for both 4.1.2 and 4.2? (Was: XMLcatalog documentation)
  - From: Bob Stayton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]