This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
openjade vs. jade
- From: "A.R. (Tom) Peters" <tpeters at xs4all dot nl>
- To: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 21:45:16 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: openjade vs. jade
When I process my DocBook XML file with the command:
jade -t tex -V tex-backend \
-d /usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/print/docbook.dsl \
/usr/share/sgml/declaration/xml.dcl \
book.xml
Then I get reasonable output.
I got the recommendation to use openjade instead. However, if I do, I get
loads of messages like:
openjade:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/dtd/xml/3.1.7/docbook.cat:27:0:W: DTDDECL
catalog entries are not supported
openjade:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/catalog:28:0:W:
DTDDECL catalog entries are not supported
So openjade is not a drop-in replacement of jade? Any caveats?
What is going on, what might be wrong with DTDDECL's?
--
#>!$!%(@^%#%*(&(#@#*$^@^$##*#@&(%)@**$!(&!^(#((#&%!)%*@)(&$($$%(@#)&*!^$)^@*^@)
Tom "thriving on chaos" Peters
NL-1062 KD nr 149 tel. +31-204080204
Amsterdam e-mail tpeters@xs4all.nl