This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
"--" again; this time via passivetex
- To: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: "--" again; this time via passivetex
- From: Tim Waugh <twaugh at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:40:43 +0100
- List-Id: <docbook-apps.lists.oasis-open.org>
--924gEkU1VlJlwnwX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
This troublesome document:
<!DOCTYPE para ...>
<para>Two dashes or not two dashes: --?</para>
gets converted using openjade to TeX correctly, so long as you use the
right patch from CVS. (The two dashes come out as '-\/-\/', and so
don't get interpreted together as a long dash.)
But xmltex/passivetex gives incorrect output, that reads:
"Two dashes or not two dashes: -?" (the single dash is long)
Any ideas on how to fix it, or even whereabouts the bug is?
Thanks,
Tim.
*/
--924gEkU1VlJlwnwX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7xwDpyaXy9qA00+cRAsN9AKCL/nDYFK9uwAVtDzFdYDKGes6TCwCgh2UQ
bFBCoRjsvaTBwf2RT6xkkkY=
=/Hhk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--924gEkU1VlJlwnwX--