This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: disappearing header
Hi Ian,
Thanks for your suggestion. In fact that was even worse :-(
My size is A5, and when I try to specify it by changing the default or
with the command line parameter, I get indeed an A5 document, but
starting from the middle of my page, the other middle being blank...
This makes me think more and more of a corrupted bounding box.
Camille.
Ian Castle a écrit :
>
> Have you tried changing ghostscript to use A4 as default?
>
> Uncomment the line in gs_init.ps
>
> If you don't want A4 as your default then you will have to pass it as a
> command line option to gs (i.e. edit the ps2ps script or whatever).
>
> Here is a patch against a rather old version 4.03 which I happened to
> have to hand.....
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> diff -Naur gs4.03.orig/gs_init.ps gs4.03/gs_init.ps
> --- gs4.03.orig/gs_init.ps Fri May 1 17:57:41 1998
> +++ gs4.03/gs_init.ps Wed Oct 25 13:55:08 2000
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
> systemdict /.languagelevel known not { /.languagelevel 1 def } if
>
> % Optionally choose a default paper size other than U.S. letter.
> -% (a4) /PAPERSIZE where { pop pop } { /PAPERSIZE exch def } ifelse
> +(a4) /PAPERSIZE where { pop pop } { /PAPERSIZE exch def } ifelse
>
> % Turn on array packing for the rest of initialization.
> true setpacking
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> camille@mandrakesoft.com wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nobody replied to my message, I then post it again.
> > I also tried dvipdf utility, it gives once again the same result.
> > I guess the problem is then in jadetex...
> >
> > The paper size settings seems to be wrong.
> >
> > Camille.
> >
> > camille@mandrakesoft.com a écrit :
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Just noticed a strange behavior of postscript output by jadetex and
> > > dvips.
> > > If you take the resulting .ps and then convert it to PDF, the header
> > > (typically the name of the chapter) is cut.
> > > Even performing a ps2ps conversion ("ps2ps uses gs(1) to convert
> > > PostScript(tm) file "input.ps" to simpler and (usually) faster
> > > PostScript in "output.ps"") I get the same result!
> > >
> > > Any idea?
> > >
> > > Thanks, Camille.