Re: mksetupini fails validating packages because curr is test

[Jon Turney <jon dot turney at dronecode dot org dot uk>]

On 29/11/2017 21:34, Ivan Gagis wrote:
> What is that timestamp? Is it when the package was uploaded?

Sorry, by timestamp, I just mean the mtime of the archive file.

> Then it should not be possible, because lower version definitely was
> uploaded earlier than higher version package.
>
> Where are those timestamps kept? Hint files does not contain any
> timestamp and setup.ini only has its global timestamp, but not
> per-package timestamps.
>
> Do you have any suggestion of how to fix this?

Assuming you've found a bug, I need some more details to enable me to 
reproduce it, before I can fix it...

> 2017-11-29 18:52 GMT+02:00 Jon Turney:
> > On 29/11/2017 15:06, Ivan Gagis wrote:
> > > I have an overlay cygwin repo where I publish my packages.
> > >
> > > Recently I started getting errors from mksetupini script:
> > >
> > > "
> > > mksetupini: package 'mypackage' version '0.4.38-1' is most recent
> > > non-test version, but version '0.4.43-1' is curr:
> > > mksetupini: package set has errors, not writing setup.ini
> > > "
> > >
> > > there was no such errors before. And I don't have "test:" in any hint
> > > files of my packages, so no I dea why it thinks that some versions are
> > > non-test and curr is test?
> >
> >
> > It's not saying any versions are test.
> >
> > > Can you explain what this actually means?
> >
> >
> > "most recent" means "latest timestamp"
> >
> > So this is telling you that 0.4.38-1 is the non-test version which has the
> > most recent timestamp, but 0.4.43-1 is curr: (because it's the highest
> > non-test version)

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple