This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.3.1152-1
- From: Gary Johnson <garyjohn at spocom dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 15:48:33 -0800
- Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.3.1152-1
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <announce dot 51B65778 dot 8020200 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <52096B42 dot 8010702 at Kautler dot net> <CAKChYSpP=AKMOc7yHL9NMJyQeKEvsswgKFTyJVKZZrg5vqbPsQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAKChYSpBEmXquHxkC2LZSmgH60kXfTxriDVX_Ap6HC4GNMRWMg at mail dot gmail dot com> <20131206171721 dot GA7240 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <CAKChYSqyXHXUh1GVNsOEZWPbS=RsObb_gOCLX5kycMFWej-mwQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 2013-12-06, Björn Kautler wrote:
> 2013/12/6 Christopher Faylor:
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 06:07:17PM +0100, Bj?rn Kautler wrote:
> >>Do my messages come through at all?
> >>No-one answers or cares about this one. :-(
> >
> > Either it is this:
> > 1) http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#WJM
> >
> > Or maybe this:
> > 2) http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> >
> > Or maybe it is that this is a question has been asked and answered
> > repeatedly.
> >
> > Install the 'vim' package. You likely only have vim-minimal installed. We
> > don't know for sure because you didn't provide the details from 2).
> Hi Christopher,
>
> thanks for your reply.
> Do you really think it could be 2)?
> I didn't ask a question like "hey somehting is not working".
> But rather I found out where the problem is in the code and provided
> two proposed fixes, not knowing which one is appropriate.
> It is totally not depending on my installation, but on the sourcecode
> of the package.
> I could provide the information requested in 2), but I don't think it
> would help in this case.
> And yes, I have the "vim" package installed, not only the "vim-minimal" package.
This is apparently not a bug but a deliberate decision by the Red
Hat package maintainers. I base that on the observation that
/usr/bin/vi and /usr/bin/vim on my Fedora 17 installation are
configured with those same system vimrc files:
$ /usr/bin/vi --version
...
system vimrc file: "/etc/virc"
...
$ /usr/bin/vim --version
...
system vimrc file: "/etc/vimrc"
...
It makes sense that Cygwin, belonging to Red Hat, would use the same
configuration as other Red Hat distributions.
(Please correct me if I've misstated the relationships between Red
Hat, Fedora and Cygwin.)
Regards,
Gary
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple