This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Redefinition of `struct in6_addr'?
- From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:02:44 -0400
- Subject: Re: Redefinition of `struct in6_addr'?
- References: <CAEE3Wrm8MwsN2MMNTRGdLgJvSHPnusJN-TXZrJFL-26BtrW_ng at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130424154409 dot GX26397 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <CAEE3Wrm4iARi33g3gOqfbyJ_Jwc6phQ8xNZSQ6=Cknj-bUQ1-g at mail dot gmail dot com> <CE9C056E12502146A72FD81290379E9A6095C4FA at ENFIRHMBX1 dot datcon dot co dot uk> <CAEE3Wr=cDmAKuJ5rDK0wYoW9hVYzdfTnXCvjVMUhe0qgC4kzGA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130424175107 dot GZ26397 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <20130424175359 dot GH5968 at type dot youpi dot perso dot aquilenet dot fr> <20130424181248 dot GA26397 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <51782672 dot 10509 at cygwin dot com> <CAEE3Wr=WXVVZk9eV1M4dXYvRofaMcGFi6nF5n4F6i7PpEEA-iA at mail dot gmail dot com>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On 4/24/2013 5:45 PM, Max Balduino wrote:
This way the winapi32 headers don't declare struct
in6_addr, I didn't check, but I guess they do so only #ifndef
_CYGWIN_IN6_H, am I right?
No but close. The w32api header checks for the definition of s6_addr.
--
Larry
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple