This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Win2000 compatibility


On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:44:10PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:35:12PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:48 AM, jojelino wrote:
>>>> --
>>>> GetModuleHandleEx is known to be supported in minimum winxp (0x0501),
>>>> according to
>>>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms683200(v=vs.85).aspx
>>>> by the way, in winbase.h, it is enabled with minimum of win2k. which should
>>>> be fixed.
>>>> #if (_WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0500)
>>>> WINBASEAPI BOOL WINAPI GetModuleHandleExA(DWORD,LPCSTR,HMODULE*);
>>>> WINBASEAPI BOOL WINAPI GetModuleHandleExW(DWORD,LPCWSTR,HMODULE*);
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>
>>>Please report that at
>>>http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=102435&group_id=2435&func=browse
>>>so we can fix it before Chris gets out the next release.
>>
>>Huh? ÂNo. ÂDon't do that. ÂThe above has nothing to do with Cygwin. ÂPlease
>>don't co-opt this list for MinGW concerns.
>
> Sorry. ÂNevermind. ÂYou were referring to the winbase.h issue not the
> setup.exe issue.

Apology accepted.  Yes, winbase.h issue was my reference.  Funny I
just read an anecdote about Responding vs Reacting. ;)

-- 
Earnie
-- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]