This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I think that telnet is telnet(1) or /bin/telnet and it normally connects to another machine starting up an interactive shell session but it can also connect to any other port and as such generally serves as a way to have a primitive "conversation" with a "listener" (AKA service) on the other end hence the telnet <machine> 25 or telnet <machine> 80. But it is not similar to OpenSSH or Putty. While you could ssh to a non standard port I believe ssh will, at least by default, encrypt traffic thus making it utterly useless as a primitive "I'll just connect to the SMTP port of that machine and speak 'SMTP' to it" usage.It's not a telnet connection. You're not using telnet! You're using gnutls-cli, which is not telnet.Fair enough, I like clarity too. More precisely I could say that it is a secure form of telnet-like communication, similar to OpenSSL or Putty, perhaps. What do you think?
Hey, you asked what I thought... -- Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com> The 2 most common elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.
-- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |