This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 22/11/2010 14:17, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Nov 20 18:25, Jason Curl wrote: >> On 15/11/2010 17:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On Nov 9 09:20, Jason Curl wrote: >>>> 166 65418 [main] ipcheck 5580 ioctl: fd 3, cmd 80087364 >>>> --- Process 5580, exception C0000005 at 610C8C86 >>> >>> Crash in Cygwin, but the address doesn't help much, unfortunately. >>> >>>> Interestingly enough, the program works. That is, it finds all >>>> interfaces and returns correct values (except interface names are >>>> UUIDs instead of something more friendly like "eth0" that existed in >>>> 1.5.26). >>>> >> I've generated a relatively simple test case that I can compile >> using cygwin1-20101102.dll. > > Thank you. I can't reproduce any slowness, each ioctl takes only a > couple of milliseconds. At least I could reproduce the exception when > stracing the testcase and I've applied a matching patch to Cygwin. > > Can you retry with the next developer snapshot? Are the ioctl calls > still slow? If so, I'm wondering if the GetAdaptersAddresses call is > rather slow if a lot of interfaces exist. Every single ioctl in your > application calls GetAdaptersAddresses twice, like this: > > Can you test how long this call takes in your scenario, and if it > might be the culprit?
Regards, Jason.
Attachment:
out.txt.bz2
Description: Binary data
-- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |