Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated [security]: bash-3.2.49-23

[Edward Lam <edward at sidefx dot com>]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:51:47AM -0400, Edward Lam wrote:
> > Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > And for those who want to wail about this, take a look at the various
> > > "Why is Cygwin so slow????" threads that have been here in the last
> > > month.  Every special case accommodation we make to allow MS-DOSisms to
> > > work seamlessly adds code to Cygwin and cause corresponding slowness
> > > for everything.
>>
> > That's an interesting view.  So are you saying that this is why MINGW
> > is faster?
>
> No, they just aren't as mean as we are.  We like to make things
> purposely slow because then people suffer.

I asked what I thought was a sensible question for someone who doesn't 
know the internal workings of cygwin/mingw. It wasn't meant as a flame 
bait. I was just interested in what trade-offs mingw might be making for 
its speed.

-Edward

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple