This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: Help on dos2unix
The command 'type dos2unix' gives the following result : dos2unix is /usr/bin/dos2unix
There is also a dos2unix in /bin.
It seems that there are identical (at least same name and same size).
Thanks for your help.
-----Message d'origine-----
De?: Eric Blake [mailto:ebb9@byu.net]
Envoyé?: jeudi 11 septembre 2008 03:03
À?: cygwin@cygwin.com; Heude Pascal (LTS)
Objet?: Re: Help on dos2unix
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Please don't top-post: http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : cygwin-owner AT cygwin.com
^^^^
And please don't feed the spammers: http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR
According to Heude Pascal (LTS) on 9/10/2008 7:39 AM:
> Yes, it is the cygwin version of dos2unix. And I also use the cygwin version of make. But I am not running a bash but a pdksh.
> The command I launch is : "dos2unix l82023aa.x"
> If I look to the return code using the command "echo $?", I got 128.
128 is generally for application not found. In other words, dos2unix was
probably not found in your current PATH settings. What does 'which
dos2unix' or 'type dos2unix' say? How about 'ls /bin/dos2unix'?
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake ebb9@byu.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkjIbk4ACgkQ84KuGfSFAYA2iACcC5Us0brvehaM773Qc5uTKuDo
kjcAoJjjbSJcnjnMnCzAZoHJ81LAy3ax
=jJLq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/