Re: Problems with the snapshot 20060314 and also with snap. 20060315

["Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh at cygwin dot com>]

Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> Recently I have posted this:
>
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-03/msg00385.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-03/msg00397.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-03/msg00398.html
>
> without meaning answers.
>
> Now with the snap. 20060315 the problems are the same.


You are not entitled to a response in any time frame, or really, any
response at all just because you post.  Your message suggests that you
expect someone to jump right on this issue  and provide you with
very quick feedback.  While the former may have occurred already
(without you knowing), the latter is not required.  If you are as
concerned about this as your message suggests and it is an urgent
matter for you, please don't wait for others to look into it and give
you feedback.  Jump on in yourself.




--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/