This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers (including gcc cygming special)


Quite interesting indeed!

Are there other benchmarks around that compare gcc3.x, gcc3.x (cygwin), etc
against the gcc2.9x vintage?

H.
"chris" <caj@cs.york.ac.uk> wrote in message
407C0198.4000707@cs.york.ac.uk">news:407C0198.4000707@cs.york.ac.uk...
> Alex Vinokur wrote:
>
> >        ========================================
> >        Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers
> >        C/C++ Performance Tests
> >        =========================================
> >
> >
> >
> <snip>
>
> While this is quite interesting, it seems to me you aren't really
> running these programs for long enough for us to be able to see what
> differences are due to startup time and due to runtime. How about a
> couple of extra jobs, one of which runs for 1 minute and one for 2?
>
>
>




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]