This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: {FAQ, UG} alert? rebase
At 09:26 AM 2/23/2004, Thomas L Roche you wrote:
>At 09:38 PM 2/22/2004, Thomas L Roche wrote:
>>> Given recent traffic concerning the goodness of rebase'ing, e.g.
>
>>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01097.html
>>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg00899.html
>
>>> (but occasional breakage, e.g.
>
>>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01100.html
>
>>> ) perhaps some treatment of the topic is FAQ- or UG-worthy?
>
>Larry Hall 02/22/2004 10:49:11 PM:
>> I think we can categorize the current problem as a bug.
>
>The zsh problem, yes
>
>> Given that this is likely a bug, it doesn't make much sense to
>> document it formally in the FAQ or UG.
>
>I wasn't proposing to document the zsh/rebase bug, but rather the
>
>* general goodness of rebase
>
>* specific use of rebase for problem solution (e.g. prior to
> full-scale debugging) and general "cygwin hygeine."
Ah, my apologies! Sure, this makes sense. Patch away! :-)
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/