This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: {FAQ, UG} alert? rebase
- From: Thomas L Roche <tlroche at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Cygwin List <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:26:25 -0500
- Subject: Re: {FAQ, UG} alert? rebase
At 09:38 PM 2/22/2004, Thomas L Roche wrote:
>> Given recent traffic concerning the goodness of rebase'ing, e.g.
>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01097.html
>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg00899.html
>> (but occasional breakage, e.g.
>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01100.html
>> ) perhaps some treatment of the topic is FAQ- or UG-worthy?
Larry Hall 02/22/2004 10:49:11 PM:
> I think we can categorize the current problem as a bug.
The zsh problem, yes
> Given that this is likely a bug, it doesn't make much sense to
> document it formally in the FAQ or UG.
I wasn't proposing to document the zsh/rebase bug, but rather the
* general goodness of rebase
* specific use of rebase for problem solution (e.g. prior to
full-scale debugging) and general "cygwin hygeine."
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/