This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: New snapshot 12/23 and xemacs-success
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:35:28 -0500
- Subject: Re: New snapshot 12/23 and xemacs-success
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 10:52:47AM -0800, Steven Elliot Harris wrote:
>"Yadin Y Goldschmidt" <email@example.com> writes:
>>The most recent snapshot from 12/23 solved all these problems.
>I disagree. For the first time in about three months, XEmacs (along
>with Gnus using a whole bunch of child processes) works almost fine.
>That is, the network connections opened by Gnus, openssl, and starttls
>stay open longer than ten seconds and don't block XEmacs when it tries
>to read from or close these connections. Thank you for that.
>But XEmacs (21.4.13) still crashes the moment one exits Gnus. This is
>probably related to XEmacs shutting down the child processes mentioned
So, if I am understanding you correctly then this is not a regression.
Since I don't use XEmacs, this is likely to stay broken.
>Also, keychain or ssh-agent don't work properly with this
>snapshot. Keychain starts up ssh-agent, but no subsequent ssh (or
>ssh-add) operations can communicate with the started agent.
ssh-agent and ssh-add are working fine for me. I don't use keychain,
however. I don't know what "no subsequent ssh operations can communicate
with the started agent" means. What, specifically, are you seeing?
>I'd send my full cygcheck output, but cygcheck won't run properly,
Are you running cygcheck from the snapshot?
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html