This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?


I faced the same problem. Upgrading from the old monolithic gcc to the new separate front end packaged ones only gave me gcc-c. I had to separately select gcc-c++.

I'm not sure whether this can be classified as a setup dependency bug, since you always face this kind of problem when you split up a monolithic package into separate smaller ones. Which one(s) do you classifiy as the default successor(s)?

Patrick

Brian Ford schrieb:

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Brian P Kasper wrote:
However, if you already had the old monolithic gcc package when updating
to the new separate front end packages, then it is a setup/gcc dependency
bug and you should have gotten gcc-g++.





-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]