This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Is Cygwin really required?
- From: Rolf Campbell <rcampbell at tropicnetworks dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 15:24:56 -0400
- Subject: Re: Is Cygwin really required?
- References: <Xns9361B766BBBBAlucianoavgmxnet@80.91.224.249>
- Reply-to: IDontLikePersonalReplies at hotmail dot com
Luciano wrote:
So, sed 4.0.7 for Win32 has just seen the light of day, with a few
bug fixes. Cygwin currently uses 4.0.5. Can I just drop in the new
Win32 version in my /bin directory, or do I have to wait for an ad
hoc Cygwin port? Apparently, these programs we use are linked to
Cygwin1.dll somehow...
Countless thanks,
The Win32 version will not support posix paths. But, other than that,
it should still work fine.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/