This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1
Ralf Habacker wrote:
It sure would have been nice if you'd mentioned this idea at some point
over the past two months that I've been working on this, and CC:ing the
cygwin list on the progress or lack of it. (I also tried this at one
point, and ran into problems; I don't recall what they were. This was
so easy to do that it didn't take long to implement or test -- and it
failed, so I dropped it and it left very little impression on me about
WHY it failed. Sorry.)
i've played a little with this stuff and have seen, that at least for cygwin
there is an easier way to deal with this. Create a simple link from 'foo' to
'foo.exe' and Makes need are fullfilled.
# The program doesn't exist.
\$echo \"\$0: error: \$progdir/\$program does not exist\" 1>&2
\$echo \"This script is just a wrapper for \$program.\" 1>&2
echo \"See the $PACKAGE documentation for more information.\" 1>&2
chmod +x $output
+ ln -s $output $output$exeext
The single added line fix this.
But, in any case, *even if it worked in all cases*, it's too late. At
this point, this IS the mechanism that libtool will use; it's been
through the wringer with the folks on the automake list, libtool list,
and has been tested on cygwin and mingw. The symlink idea has not
(plus, there's my earlier experience in which the symlink idea failed
the question now is, does the current implementation work, or not. I'm
not interested at this point in finding another mechanism. I'm
interested in working any kinks out of THIS one -- if there are any
left. I have beaten on it pretty hard, ya know.
But, I'm not being completely arbitrary here; there's more in store for
the executable wrapper idea. Eventually, I'd like to subsume all of the
script wrapper's functionality into the executable wrapper, and do away
with the script entirely.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html