This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: strtof is missing
- From: "Rolf Campbell" <rcampbell at tropicnetworks dot com>
- To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Cc: <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 17:34:46 -0500
- Subject: RE: strtof is missing
Wouldn't it be more helpful to point out that the function is
deprecated?
-Rolf
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 5:21 PM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Cc: jjohnstn@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: strtof is missing
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:54:08PM -0500, J. Johnston wrote:
> >Chris,
> >
> > Can you clarify. Do you want me to duplicate the routine or stick
> >with the solution I originally presented which is to rename
> the routine
> >and leave a #define that maps the old name to the new one.
>
> I think your plan is fine. I think just renaming the
> function in newlib and creating a define to deal with legacy
> newlib apps is the correct way to handle this. We can also
> make modifications in the cygwin side to make it transparent
> to the end user.
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/