This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Surprises running gcc 3.2 configure on cygwin
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 07:08:21PM -0700, Tim Prince wrote:
>> SEEMS STRANGE to have one and not the other. DOES IT MATTER?
>Since vfork is not a standard C function, no one says there need be such a
>header. There are bigger isssues with vfork on Windows, see the list archive.
I'm not aware of any issues with vfork on Windows. vfork should be much faster
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html