This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: gcc 3
- From: "Michael D. Crawford" <crawford at goingware dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 21:20:47 -0500
- Subject: RE: gcc 3
That's good to know, some of what I want to use it for is C++.
But how is it for generating correct code? Does the machine code correspond
accurately to what the source requested?
I suppose I can test myself, but one of the things I'd like to do with it is
build processor-optimized glibc's for my Linux systems. It would be a drag if
the code was incorrect.
Mike
---
I have been looking at the C++ compiler only - and it is much
better/stricter with respect to ANSI.
gcc 3.1 is certainly the one I would be looking for.
--
Michael D. Crawford
GoingWare Inc. - Expert Software Development and Consulting
http://www.goingware.com/
crawford@goingware.com
Subscribe to the GoingWare Newsletter at http://www.goingware.com/newsletter/
Tilting at Windmills for a Better Tomorrow.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/