This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: gcc 3
- From: "Michael D. Crawford" <crawford at goingware dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 21:05:16 -0500
- Subject: RE: gcc 3
I understand that gcc 3.0 was pretty buggy, but I've read that 3.1 is much more
reliable. In your experience, is it as reliable as gcc 2.95.x?
I would like to recompile some things in gcc 3.1, because I understand it has
better processor-specific optimizations than gcc 2.95 did. But I only want to
do that if it's going to produce correct code.
Mike
--
Michael D. Crawford
GoingWare Inc. - Expert Software Development and Consulting
http://www.goingware.com/
crawford@goingware.com
Subscribe to the GoingWare Newsletter at http://www.goingware.com/newsletter/
Tilting at Windmills for a Better Tomorrow.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/