This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: Default mounts : one redundant?




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Collins [mailto:robert.collins@itdomain.com.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:50 AM
> To: Bernard Dautrevaux; cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: RE: Default mounts : one redundant?
> 
> 
> This is off-topic, it belongs on cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com. And 
> the answer
> is in that lists archives.

OK so if I understand correctly, the redundant mount here is effectively
useless, as the "/" mount is done in binary mode, but is created by the
cygwin-Xfree post-install script because "/" may be mounted in text mode.

My question was just motivated by the fact the mount option were identical;
I ask it here because this is in fact a general cygwin topic: if I *need*
something to be accessed in binary mode (and don't want to look at all
refering programs) I must mount the tree binary, even if the mount may be,
in some cases, redundant. 

And that is not, IMNSHO, off-topic.

        Bernard

--------------------------------------------
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess Ingenierie
97 bis, rue de Colombes
92400 COURBEVOIE
FRANCE
Tel:	+33 (0) 1 47 68 80 80
Fax:	+33 (0) 1 47 88 97 85
e-mail:	dautrevaux@microprocess.com
-------------------------------------------- 
> 
> Rob
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bernard Dautrevaux [mailto:Dautrevaux@microprocess.com] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:43 PM
> > To: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'
> > Subject: RE: Default mounts : one redundant?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf@redhat.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:39 PM
> > > To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> > > Subject: Re: Default mounts : one redundant?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:39:12PM +0100,
> > > fergus@bonhard.uklinux.net wrote:
> > > >Nothing altered from the default full installation:
> > > >
> > > >~> mount -m
> > > >mount -f -s -b "c:/Cygwin/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts"
> > > >"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts"
> > > >mount -f -s -b "c:/Cygwin/bin" "/usr/bin"
> > > >mount -f -s -b "c:/Cygwin/lib" "/usr/lib"
> > > >mount -f -s -b "c:/Cygwin" "/"
> > > >mount -s -b --change-cygdrive-prefix "/cygdrive"
> > > >~>
> > > >
> > > >If c:/Cygwin is mounted under /, is it necessary to have 
> > > >c:/Cygwin/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts mounted additionally under 
> > > >/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts?
> > > 
> > > Yes.
> > > 
> > 
> > And is it too much to ask why?
> > 
> >         Bernard
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------
> > Bernard Dautrevaux
> > Microprocess Ingenierie
> > 97 bis, rue de Colombes
> > 92400 COURBEVOIE
> > FRANCE
> > Tel:	+33 (0) 1 47 68 80 80
> > Fax:	+33 (0) 1 47 88 97 85
> > e-mail:	dautrevaux@microprocess.com
> > -------------------------------------------- 
> > 
> > --
> > Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> > Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> > Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> > FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> > 
> > 
> 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]