This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: OFF-TOPIC, but...


On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 10:28:26PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>===
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com>
>To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
>Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 4:06 PM
>Subject: OFF-TOPIC, but...
>
>>I thought I might as well be the first person to post this:
>>
>>http://www.washtech.com/news/media/14759-1.html
>>
>>This was, of course, news to me.
>>
>>One would wonder what this means for Cygwin.  I think the definitive
>>answer would be "Cygwin?  Huh?  What's that?"
>
>Are you suggesting the community should prepare to find a new home?
>Wouldn't AOL actually like cygwin as a transition tool - reading
>between the lines of that news clipping...

It's way too early for me to be suggesting anything.

When Red Hat acquired Cygnus, the response to "What are you going to
do about Cygwin" was basically "Hmm.  That's a very good question..."
rustle, rustle, rustle <whisper> "What the heck is Cygwin?"

I assume that, if this rumored negotiation is true, Cygwin hasn't
entered the radar yet and may never enter it, even though it does
occasionally make some money for Red Hat.

Regardless, I'm sure I'll be able to find a home for Cygwin somewhere.
I doubt that sources.redhat.com is going anywhere...

"Contributions gratefully accepted."  :-)

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]