This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Signal handling in tight loops
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Subject: Re: Signal handling in tight loops
- From: ejrh at paradise dot net dot nz
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 23:33:07 GMT
> Why don't you write a simple test case?
Because I am at work where I don't have cygwin, or any compiler of any
form for that matter.
> This technique should be much more useful than inviting random opinions
> from a mailing list and it should be MUCH faster.
I've only had one random opinion so far. :)
Original question:
> > the alarm signal could not be raised in very tight loops, because
> > signals were only checked when memory was accessed. Does this apply
> > to cygwin, by any chance?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/