This is the mail archive of the cygwin@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Reason for cygwin GCC 2.97 non-bootstrap found


> The point being?  There's _still_ no reason it _must_ be done
> in libiberty.

No, but a generic valloc would make sense in libiberty.  If the final
solution includes a generic valloc implementation, it might make more
sense to put that in libiberty rather than gcc.

You're right that it's not a *pressing* reason, but it is something to
consider.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]