This is the mail archive of the firstname.lastname@example.org
mailing list for the Cygwin project. See the Cygwin
home page for more information.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [ANN] Cygwin DEV survey
- To: "Smith, Martin" <martin@exchange.Scotland.NCR.com>
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Cygwin DEV survey
- From: Stipe Tolj <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 02:12:29 +0100
- CC: Cygwin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Delivered-To: email@example.com
- Delivered-To: mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org
- Mailing-List: contact email@example.com; run by ezmlm
- Organization: Department of Economical Computer Science, University of Cologne, Germany
- References: <286215C2CA1AD211A13500A024535B5887C8DA@eukscpo3.Dundee.NCR.COM>
- Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Sender: email@example.com
Smith, Martin wrote:
> * What about text/binary mounts - I get the feeling binary mounts are
> preferred for most applications but, by default, the Cygnus tools install
> with text mounts. Is it wise to change this to binary for a 'development'
> install or not?
I'm not quite sure about that. Personaly I prefer text mounts for
development reasons, but I would like to hear some statements from the
core developers towards this item.
> * What about environment variables? At the moment these are in a batch
> file but I usually add them to my NT environment and call Bash directly. Is
> this appropriate? What about other settings like term etc? Is there any
> "best" environment?
I suppose the env vars will be set in a global .bashrc or .profile file
started with bash.
> * Once installed, how best to manage updates to included packages? Is
> there any advantage to using RPM or would it be best to stick with
> tarballs/diff/patch initially? I don't think many people are using any form
> of package management on cygwin yet but perhaps this would be useful?
Of course it would be usefull, but we will stick to tarball mechanisms
here for the beginning, I suppose.
> * Would this include helper scripts like the modified "install" which
> many packages need to cope with .exe extensions? I'm sure there have been a
> few more handy scripts/wrappers on this list as well.
Hopefully yes, at least for those available and integratable for the
> * Would/could it set up /bin, /etc mounts as well as the default ones
> provided by Cygwin?
I suppose yes.
> * It would be handy if it could (eventually) offer to set inetutils up
> for you as well (as an NT service if you are on NT). Don't know how feasible
> this one is...
inetutils will be part of the software package, but I'm not aware if it
should initialize and run automaticly after installation.
> * Of course, using InstallShield, you could offer some of these as
> options under "Custom" setup.
> Anyway, that's enough from me. I certainly support this suggestion and think
> it would be a good way of allowing more people to get up & running with the
> Cygwin tools without having to go through the regular FAQ session first :-)
> If you need a Beta tester for any of this, let me know ;-)
Stipe Tolj <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cygwin Porting Project
Department of Economical Computer Science
University of Cologne, Germany
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to email@example.com