This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Windows98 + inetutils
- To: Olle Olsson <olleo at sics dot se>
- Subject: Re: Windows98 + inetutils
- From: "Hilton Fernandes" <hgfernan at usp dot br>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 08:39:03 +0000
- CC: Stipe Tolj <tolj at uni-duesseldorf dot de>, gnu-win32 at cygnus dot com, Hilton Fernandes <hgfernan at swan2 dot uspnet dot usp dot br>
- Reply-to: Hilton Fernandes <hgfernan at usp dot br>
On 22 Sep 98 at 14:56, Olle Olsson <olleo@sics.se> wrote:
> Being able to mimic an ordinary Unix way of handling users/groups/passwords/... via
> "/etc"-files seems like useful approach. The core API functionality remains the same
> to a large extent, the difference is only in where things are stored and updated.
>
> To what extent can one have *one* implementation of the API? What if there are /etc
> files on an NT, should these or the NT-owned structures be used. Presumably, as
> Windows95 (Windows98?) is weak on security, the NT-way of handling it should be used
> on the NT, while on Windows9x the file-based approach is taken. This would enable a
> wider portability, something that simplifies management of the system.
>
> /olle
>
Hello!
Sorry for an empty message. :-( As the great Forrest Gump would
say, Shit happens! :-)
It's possible that someone that uses MS-Windows 9X isn't particularly
afraid of security problems; otherwise, he or she would prefer NT or
some other OS. Indeed, any user of a Windows 9X OS is already a
priviledged user that can do anything to the system.
So, maybe there isn't any additional problem with a non secure access
to Windows 9X.
Regards,
--Hilton
----
Hilton Fernandes
hgfernan@usp.br
hfernandes@geocities.com
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lakes/5657
URLs and help on C++ programming and Object-Oriented Design
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".