This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
Re: 2 button keypad
- From: Jon TURNEY <jon dot turney at dronecode dot org dot uk>
- To: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
- Cc: bagleyd at tux dot org
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:19:49 +0100
- Subject: Re: 2 button keypad
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <56191 dot 100 dot 1 dot 74 dot 8 dot 1380502475 dot squirrel at calypso dot tux dot org>
- Reply-to: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
- Reply-to: cygwin-xfree <cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com>
On 30/09/2013 01:54, bagleyd@tux.org wrote:
> I am a long time user. And I love the new 64 bit version seems to cleared
> up all my virus scanner induced problems.
>
> On two different laptops I noticed that -emulate3buttons 100 (or without
> the 100) is ignored. I don't have 2 button mouse only 2 button mousepads.
> This used to work. For Toshiba, I don't know of a work around. For my
> Lenovo, I activated a middle button (but for consistency I would always
> like the two button way to always work).
-emulate3ubttons appears to work correctly for me.
> According to documentation its
> deactivated if you don't have a 2 button button mouse... so a 2 button
> keypad does not seem to qualify? It seems to me it should never be
> deactivated if someone requests it.
The documentation for '-emulate3buttons' says that the *default* is to enable
that option if Windows reports a two buttons, otherwise disabled.
An explicit -emulate3buttons should always override the default.
Can you please provide your /var/log/xwin/XWin.0.log
--
Jon TURNEY
Volunteer Cygwin/X X Server maintainer
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/