This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
Re: 1.5.21: startxwin.sh works, startxwin.bat does not work
- From: René Berber <r dot berber at computer dot org>
- To: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 23:25:52 -0500
- Subject: Re: 1.5.21: startxwin.sh works, startxwin.bat does not work
- Openpgp: url=hkp://random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de
- References: <451DA615.6070206@ohelp.com> <efk9m2$k1c$1@sea.gmane.org> <451DB516.1010403@ohelp.com> <efkg2h$2b6$1@sea.gmane.org> <45207D12.8030405@ohelp.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
Scott Fordin wrote:
[snip]
> Strange thing though is that it does work on another machine.
Very strange, the differences you sent don't show an invalid script at all. One of the 2 files has \r\n endings (that's the reason for the first 2 differences) but as long as they are being executed by command.com it doesn't matter.
[snip]
> Well, the way things install, a "Start X Server" shortcut is
> installed on the desktop. It's more handy than opening a bash
> shell and then running startx from there. I've tried configuring
> a similar shortcut for startx, but I can't get it to work.
You can create a shortcut to startx.sh and then edit its "Properties" so the target ends up like: C:\cygwin\bin\run.exe -p /usr/X11R6/bin/ bash --login -c startx
[Ref:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin.xfree/16545]
I use a shortcut to start X Windows only (no xterm):
C:\cygwin\bin\run.exe -p /usr/X11R6/bin XWin -multiwindow -clipboard -silent-dup-error -dpi 100
> Since
> startxwin.bat fails with the same error as startxserver.bat, I
> can't just use that on the desktop instead. I don't have a
> standalone version of Perl installed, so I can't run the .sh
> version of the script. I don't know how else to do it. I looked,
> but I didn't find an answer, but do you know of a way I can pass
> a shell command to bash.exe from the Windows command prompt?
If your path includes the location of Cygwin's binaries you can use run as above.
[snip]
> There are differences, but none seems significant vis a vis
> this particular problem. I've attached the diff output. I
> can't even figure out where the lapack libraries are being
> called...
Nowhere... so what is being run?
--
René Berber
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/