RE: x2x 1.30-1 broken ?

["Thomas Chadwick" <j_tetazoo at hotmail dot com>]

Strange.  I can't seem to re-create the problem you are having.  It works 
just fine for me when I use it in the manner you describe.  Could you be a 
little more explicit?  Maybe I'm going something that you're not, or 
vice-versa.

> From: gagou <zegagou@yahoo.com>
> Reply-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
> To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
> Subject: x2x 1.30-1 broken ?
> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 03:47:15 -0800 (PST)
>
> Hi,
>
> When I enter "x2x -from localhost:0 -to
> distanthost:0", I get "x2x: display names are both
> 127.0.0.1:0.0" and $? is set to 1.
> It seems like command line parameters aren't used at
> all, and x2x fallback to using the DISPLAY set.
> - if I set DISPLAY to whatever, the answer I get is
> "x2x: display names are both whatever"
> - x2x -copyright also tells "display names are both
> ..."
>
> 1.27-3 still works great...
>
> Gael.
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html

_________________________________________________________________
Persistent heartburn? Check out Digestive Health & Wellness for information 
and advice. http://gerd.msn.com/default.asp