This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
Re: results/problems (Re: [PATCH] Copy/Paste non-ascii characters)
Jay,
Jay Smith wrote:
Harold,
I have done the installation and I have several things to report. If
some of these are not for this list, please advise. First of all, FYI,
when I did the install, Progeny would not respond at all so I used
Purdue. In any case, I turned OFF everything and then turned on only
XFree xserve, scalable fonts, and xwinclip -- those of course caused
some other things to turn on automatically.
1) The main problem of copy/paste of non-ascii characters *within* Linux
Mozilla seems to be *fixed*. Thanks!
That is good to know. Thanks to Kensuke Matsuzaki.
However....
2) I had my own modified script (with its own unique filename) that was
used to start X; I guess this was before startxdmcp.bat was available.
I copied my script into place. However, when I run MY script now, it
seems like the command (in MY script)
start XWin -nodecoration -clipboard -once -query jsa.jaysmith.com
actually (also?) RUNS startxdmcp.bat
That is very odd and I am not sure what to do. I had to modify
startxdmcp.bat to bring it in line with my script so the proper command
would get done.
I believe that startxdmcp.bat is getting run because the DOS box that
appears says so, identifying it by name -- even if *I* don't directly
run it.
You would have to send in your script and your copy of startxdmcp.bat
and the exact command you are using to run your script in order for us
to figure out what is going on.
3) I think that startxdmcp.bat may have an error in it. The original
version of it has the command:
start XWin -query %REMOTE_HOST% -nodecoration -lesspointer
and this causes an error in the DOS box about "too many paramaters".
I am certainly no expert, but I think that the "-query ...." should be
the LAST thing on the command line. Anyway, when I made it so (like my
original script) it worked without putting out the error.
Nope. The order of these parameters shouldn't matter. You may be
having some trouble if %REMOTE_HOST% is not properly defined or if it
has characters in it that are getting interpreted by the DOS batch
processor.
4) Generally X performance seems to be better. It is very subjective,
but so good, so far.
Huh... no performance tweaks this time. Must just feel faster :)
Harold