This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
Server Test Series - Outlived useful life?
- From: Harold L Hunt II <huntharo at msu dot edu>
- To: cygx <cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 16:44:28 -0400
- Subject: Server Test Series - Outlived useful life?
- Reply-to: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
Constantine A. Murenin suggested to me privately, and I was just
thinking the same thing today while simultaneously describing the same
release in three places (Change Log, Server Test Series announcement,
and the XFree86-xserv-4.3.0-17 announcement), that perhaps the Server
Test Series has outlived its usefulness.
The Server Test Series lives here:
http://xfree86.cygwin.com/devel/shadow/
The Change Log lives here:
http://xfree86.cygwin.com/devel/shadow/changelog.html
Perhaps it is time to do the following
======================================
1) Change the Server Test Series name to "Server Development".
2) Stop posting the XWin-TestXXX.exe.bz2 releases.
3) Stop sending TestXXX announcements.
4) Add links to the source for the current server release to the
XFree86-xserv-4.3.0-XX announcement.
5) Reformat new Change Log entries to refer only to the
XFree86-xserv-4.3.0-XX package, rather than the XWin-TestXXX.exe.bz2 file.
6) Remove installation instructions for XWin-TestXXX.exe.bz2 from the
Server Test Series (soon to be Server Development) page. Instead
describe how to get the latest release from setup.exe.
7) Start releasing the xwin-YYYYMMDD-HHMM.tar.bz2 source code via
setup.exe. This will follow a little later. The only thing included in
this source release would be xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xwin/* (roughly 130
KiB). This is the bulk of the Cygwin-specific code. Everything else
eventually finds its way into either XFree86's CVS HEAD or into our
xoncygwin CVS HEAD on sourceforge.net.
Reasons for the change
======================
1) It takes time to maintain the XWin-TestXXX.exe.bz2 releases, yet they
do not seem to be benefiting anyone.
2) It used to be true that there were sometimes XWin-TestXXX.exe.bz2
releases that were never released as an XFree86-xserv-4.3.0-XX package.
This is no longer true because I either release an
XFree86-xserv-4.3.0-XX package that is marked as 'test', or I just
release trivial changes as the new 'curr' version.
3) The XWin-TestXXX.exe.bz2 release scheme predates installation via
setup.exe. We have been installing via setup.exe for almost exactly 17
months now.
4) The whole notion of having two different names for the same release
is probably confusing the he*l out of some people.
5) I get the feeling that very few people are using the
XWin-TestXXX.exe.bz2 releases. Those few that are could just as easily
start using the XFree86-xserv-4.3.0-XX releases. They could even
manually ftp the XFree86-xserv-4.3.0-XX release and unpack it by hand if
they want the old-style of release installation :)
6) I always post the XWin-TestXXX.exe.bz2 release to my space on
www.msu.edu and I put a direct link to the files on there. I also
mention that the releases are distributed via the sources.redhat.com
mirror network and I tell where to find them. However,
XWin-Test[101,102,103].exe.bz2 were not posted to the mirror network
until today and no one complained that they were missing. This leads me
to believe that no one is getting the XWin-TestXXX.exe.bz2 releases via
the mirror network.
Reasons not to do the change
============================
1) ??? (Can't think of any)
2) Unless 3 or more people speak up in support of the current
double-release scheme (with very good reasons that justify my spending
extra time on each release in order to somehow save them much more time
in return).
Comments? Support? Disdain?
Harold