Re: [ITP]: Qt-2.3.1

[Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>]

On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 09:13:47AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>--- Harold L Hunt II <huntharo@msu.edu> wrote:
>> Ralf,
>> 
>> Since KDE on Cygwin might eventually depend on this Qt package, why
>> 
>> don't you guys decide together what the best location would be?
>> 
>> I really have no idea where to put it, so I'm all for just putting
>> it 
>> somewhere and cleaning up the mess later when we learn what we did
>> wrong.
>> 
>> The LSB doesn't specify a location for Qt, does it?
>
>I thought the decision was that all X stuff should go under X11R6/,
>but I could have misinterpreted the thread.  If not there, based on
>the LSB, I'd be inclined to stick in /opt, but if Ralf really wants
>to put it under /usr/lib then I'll do that.  Ralf?

I did say that all X stuff was Harold's decision and thought that
putting things in the X11R6 hierarchy made sense.  However, if there
is a good reason to put stuff elsewhere then I don't see why we
shouldn't do that.

In other words, I'm happy to let you all decide.

cgf