This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
Re: cygwin-xfree: xdmcp: "no valid address"
- To: alexander dot gottwald at informatik dot tu-chemnitz dot de,"Tim Koenig" <grey_hat at lycos dot com>
- Subject: Re: cygwin-xfree: xdmcp: "no valid address"
- From: Mark Plowman <m dot plowman at hexapole dot com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:31:39 +0200 (CEST)
- Cc: cygwin-xfree at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0109261512310.16005-100000@rotuma.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>
Alexander,
> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:14:57 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Alexander Gottwald <alexander.gottwald@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>
>
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Mark Plowman wrote:
>
> > > With cygwin on windows 95 B/C try to install
> > > winsock2. http://www.microsoft.com/windows95/downloads/contents/WUAdminTools/S_WUNetworkingTools/W95Sockets2/Default.asp
> > > I found it makes the difference between working and non working
> > > inetd.
> >
> > Alexander.Gottwald's ls_netdev.exe program still only prints the
> > "lo" configuration and "XWin.exe -query <LinuxBox> -from
> > <WindowsBox>" still gives "no valid address"
>
> A possible explantion was meanwhile given by Tim Koenig. It's in the
> mail archives.
Thanks. Sorry, because I am not subscribed to the list, I have only
just seen his posting:
> > From: "Tim Koenig" <grey_hat at lycos dot com>
> > Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:35:41 +0100
> >
> > (please excuse that I don't do a follow-up, but I just
> > subscribed.)
> >
> > I tried 'ls_netdev.exe' on a Windows 95 OSR 2 (Windows 95B)
> > machine (with just one ethernet card, installed Winsock 2 and no
> > Dial-Up Networking).
> >
> > Only the lo0 is returned and this is not a bug in 'ls_netdev.c' -
> > the ioctl call returns that single interface (ifc.ifc_len ==
> > sizeof (struct ifreq)) only.
> >
> > This might be a bug in Cygwin, since that framework is not present
> > at all in the Win32-API (I doubt anything like that is present in
> > Winsock 1, but Winsock 2 has a GET_INTERFACE_INFO call to WSAIoctl
> > which returns an INTERFACE_INFO) and has to be emulated
> > completely.
> >
> > - Tim
This makes the *correct* functioning that some people experience all
the more puzzling.
If the problem is in Cygwin and it doesn't a *framework* for these
queries how do some configuration work?
Strange, strange, strange...
> > I do wonder *how* it's installation helped you?
>
> I think the inetd had an other problem.
OK.
> bye
> ago
Greetings,
Mark