This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Shadow Framebuffer Test 12
- To: "Harold Hunt" <huntharo at msu dot edu>, "Cygx \(E-mail\)" <cygwin-xfree at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Shadow Framebuffer Test 12
- From: "Francis VIVAT" <francis dot vivat at cetp dot ipsl dot fr>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:42:28 +0200
- References: <001001c0b7f1$4560b160$2fab0a23@huntharo>
Hi,
The good news : it works for me on WinNT4 with DX. Fine.
The bad news : the keyboard is still bad. Not the same as before, so I can say
you touched the sources, but still bad.
Xwin.test.10 Xwin.test.12
F10 dead F10 :-)
Alt dead Alt_R :-/
AltGr Alt_L Alt_R :-)
RightShift LeftShift RightShift :-)
LeftShift LeftShift RightShift :-(
RightCtrl LeftCtrl RightCtrl :-)
LeftCtrl LeftCtrl RightCtrl :-(
KP_enter Return Return :-O
special keys cf notes idem :-O
3rd caracter not working not working :-O
Notes :
Special : when numlock is on, the KP response with KP_specialkeys (should be
KP_numbers), but when it's off, the keycodes are those from the specialkeys. It
means that shift+KP7 says shiftpress, shiftrelease, homepress, homerelease,
shiftpress, shiftrelease. It should say : shiftpress, KPhomepress,
KPhomerelease, shiftrelease, like other keys are acting.
CU
. \)|(/
. (o o)
. /-----------------ooO----(_)----Ooo-----------------\
.(_| Francis VIVAT |
. | CETP-CNRS |
. | 10-12, avenue de l'Europe 78140 Velizy |
. | Tel : +33 1 3925 4780 |
. | Fax : +33 1 3925 4922 |_
. | E-Mail : francis.vivat@cetp.ipsl.fr | )
. \---------------------------------------------------/
. (_) (_)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harold Hunt" <huntharo@msu.edu>
To: "Cygx (E-mail)" <cygwin-xfree@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: jeudi 29 mars 2001 03:40
Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Shadow Framebuffer Test 12
> I just posted Test 12 to my usual announcement page:
> http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/
>
> Test 12 is compiled with the Cygwin/XFree86 4.0.3 source code; you must have
> Cygwin/XFree86 4.0.3 installed before you install Test 12.
>
> Changes:
> 1) A great developer (John Fortin) once told me that
> the DDLOCK_NOSYSLOCK flag for IDirectDrawSurface_Lock
> was not introduced until DirectDraw4, which is not
> available for Windows NT 4.0. Including that flag
> causes the surface lock to fail on NT 4.0. I removed
> the flag from all calls to IDirectDrawSurface_Lock.
>
> Please report to the list if you are running Windows NT 4.0 and you can run
> this test but you could not run previous tests.
>
> Harold Hunt
>
>