This is the mail archive of the cygwin-talk mailing list for the cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: PID -> WindowHandle (stop/restart processes)

From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
To: "'oops nearly forgot to write something silly here. hooray for the last-chance-delayed-in-the-outbox recovery technique!'" <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 17:23:24 -0000
Subject: RE: PID -> WindowHandle (stop/restart processes)
References: <20080103220053.105D413C307@cgf.cx> <20080103230910.GC28699@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <flk0ph$npj$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080104152003.GA30957@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <fllojp$n0r$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080104171616.GA11483@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-to: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>

On 04 January 2008 17:16, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> Sorry.  It really was the case.  spamassassin was taking so long to
> process messages that it caused some connections to time out.  But,
> sourceware didn't detect this and delivered the message anyway.  Then
> the original sender reconnected to try again and hilarity ensued.

  Hmm, I wonder if that was the same thing that happened to Andrew Stubbs on
binutils list the other day?  Sounds quite similar, and again we assumed the
problem was at the sending rather than receiving end.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

References:
- Re: PID -> WindowHandle (stop/restart processes)
  - From: Robert Pendell
- Re: PID -> WindowHandle (stop/restart processes)
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: PID -> WindowHandle (stop/restart processes)
  - From: Robert Pendell
- Re: PID -> WindowHandle (stop/restart processes)
  - From: Christopher Faylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]